Spent a few days in Kobe’s Town. Thoughts on the trade talk:
I don’t think it’s as simple as a bluff. Because if it is a bluff, it’s a bad one. Sure, he got everyone talking, but here’s problems with his conflicting statements:
a. If he’s doing it to gain leverage against the organization so they trade out everyone but Ronny for another superstar, he shouldn’t have made the second statement (the quasi-retraction). In fact, he wouldn’t have. Kobe’s too smart for that – if he staged this all to force a trade to get KG or another unsatisfied superstar, he would have stayed angry in public and in private told Phil or someone with the organization that he was conflicted.
b. If he does truly want to be traded, he also wouldn’t have made the retraction. Why the hell give them any room like that? If he’s dead-set on leaving, why even worry about appeasing hometown fans with his mock warm fuzziness?
So why’d he make the second statement? I think it comes down to image and legacy. The second statement is a trumped up version of one of his baseline reverse dunks when down by 20 – it’s superfluous, except for its relation to The Book of Kobe. It’s an afterthought, but it significantly changes the historical connotations of the trade demand. People would like to posit this whole situation as: Kobe’s being a baby, he couldn’t get a ring on his own but he wants to make it seem like it was the organization’s fault. But the second statement – and yesterday’s reporting from ESPN and the Times, inverts the scenario. Flanked by a sympathetic Phil and an ILLOGICALLY sympathetic Shaq, Kobe transports back to ‘02 – before he was demonized for the Shaq trade and Colorado, back…when heeeee was younnnnnng (and looked a thing like Jesus).
So is Kobe just greedy and antsy about his legacy and tired of not getting past the 1st round despite being the best player in the league? YES OBVIOUSLY. But has he spun himself into a more proactive version of The Sympathetic KG? Yep. He knows the statements are conflicting – and he must enjoy it. Because Kobe has NEVER seemed conflicted. He’s always been driven and focused and conniving and these aspects have made him hate-able. But now he garners sympathy by putting on this Lonely Blue Boy facade (even though he is still being focused and conniving).
So where does this fit in his legacy? Well, in a day, he rewrote the last 3 years of his career, and shifted the placing of emphasis. We see the last 3 years now as his fight to get a true supporting cast, not the slow, grinding anticipation of the role players reaching their potential. All of the subplots have given way – Bynum’s apprenticeship, Odom’s ceiling – and the New Deal is this: the struggle behind the scenes has been astronomical and no one will ever know how much, but it overshadows what you saw on the court. And, in particular, because kobe didn’t fire Shaq, as we always thought, all of a sudden his search for another superstar really is a struggle, not just him trying to atone for his mistakes.
So now, if he goes, it’s A New Hope. And if he stays (and even if he gets KG or Kidd or Jermaine) the McGrady sympathy seems very likely to carry over to him, the most unsympathetic superstar in the league. If Kobe never gets another ring, he’ll go out a martyr because of yesterday’s statements. A week ago, most would say he needlessly squandered three years of his prime because of his ego. Now it seems as though he was robbed.



